|
Comments
Re: Catcher in the Rye. Pretty much every guy I know says he totally identified with it and it was the most amazing book he ever read, and pretty much every girl I know either didn't like it or just kind of went 'meh'. I think it's just that kind of book.
The number of books I've read on this list has been increased exponentially by the two years of schooling I have thus far. Had no idea my reading list consisted of 80% previously-banned books.
Posted by Amy Gordon at March 8, 2005 03:38 AM
154.20.181.160
word on the street is that Sylvester & The Magic Pebble (one of my favs) was banned because the cops in it are pigs. oi.
and little house on the prairie? WHAT?
Posted by meredith at March 8, 2005 08:00 AM
151.205.87.201
I remember being in like...6th grade and hearing some book was banned. I went to the school library to find it and when I had it in my hands I lost all interest. I don't even emember what it was.
Bridge to Terabithia is the only book on there I remember reading that people's parent's complained about in school.
Posted by Psychomelody at March 8, 2005 10:24 AM
151.201.151.213
Heh, Discworld = awesome. But seriously? Of the above, I hereby advise you to skip Nos. 96, 74, and 14. They are tragically dull, and Young Werther is *such* a pussy, for reals. Also, 24? Speaking as an evolutionary biologist, NOBODY reads it. Get a cheapass used copy of Futuyma's "Evolutionary Biology" instead (if you don't already have one left over from your collegiate days).
That said, the following books fuckin' rock: Lolita (82), the Hemingways (34,48) , Gulag Arch./Ivan Denisovich (106 & 62; read the latter first- it's basically the Condensed Guide to Soviet Prison Camps), all the Steinbecks, all the Faulkners.
And I agree with Merideth above: *Little House on the Prairie*??? WTF? Was there, perhaps, too much ... churning? Dude.
Posted by Ainsley S at March 8, 2005 12:19 PM
128.32.85.90
Maybe Little House on the Prairie was banned for being incrediblly dull. It has the honor of being the first book I stopped reading because I found it boring.
Lolita is interesting, but if you know (or are related to) a girl in her pre-teens, it is way creepy.
The 'OMG DYSTOPIAN FUTURE' books are the most fun.
Posted by Brenna at March 8, 2005 02:24 PM
24.20.8.36
James and the Giant Peach: Probably the crushing of the Aunts, and wasn't there some curse words?
Posted by Kristin at March 8, 2005 03:57 PM
129.89.126.178
I will speak up for the SF geeks and point out that "Stranger in a Strange Land" is the polar opposite of "Starship Troopers" in just about every way. I think you might dig it.
Posted by Wagner at March 8, 2005 07:03 PM
66.68.108.122
I once owned a "I Read Banned Books" button that I picked up from the New York City Anti-Censorhip League. Sadly, it has gone missing. I wish I'd read more of the books on this list. I've got a Bible (thanks to teh Mormons) and a Koran.
I wonder why the hell Flowers for Algernon is on there. It's a perfectly fine book. Sure it deals with retardation, but it's not insulting or demeaning. It's good sci-fi, damn it!
Posted by Rich at March 8, 2005 09:38 PM
141.151.58.221
Flowers for Algernon is rather good. And try to read more Vonnegut, he's real good.
Posted by Mikhail Lvovsky at March 11, 2005 07:34 AM
209.158.113.69
i had to do a book report on "Bridge To Terabithia" and i found the Book quite interesting, i had reas it once in 6th grade now in 10th and i remembered none of it until i picked the book up and started reading, good book for morals.
Posted by Ashley at May 23, 2005 05:38 PM
205.188.116.195
Hey, if any one has more information on the novel Lolita, can you please write back to my email address... jelena_808@hotmail.com.... thanx :)
Posted by Jelena at January 5, 2006 12:16 AM
216.8.175.235
|