« Templar updates, and Sparkneedle's BEEN Updatin'! | Main | Forgot to mention: Templar updated! »

May 27, 2006

Language just can't keep up, these days.

There needs to be a new word for pornography that is intentionally devoid of any erotic usefulness. The kind of stuff clearly made on a dare. The smut that exists for the sake of existing, not because anyone ever demanded it.

Because none of you are really and truly jerking it to drawings of Calvin and Hobbes sodomizing one another. You're just not. I'm sorry, but I don't believe you.

Posted by Spike at May 27, 2006 04:05 AM

Comments

close. >

Posted by fungi at May 27, 2006 08:18 AM
4.241.3.22

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=webcest&r=f

Posted by fungi at May 27, 2006 08:18 AM
4.241.3.22

> drawings of Calvin and Hobbes sodomizing one
> another.

Link please.

Posted by Tone Milazzo at May 27, 2006 10:35 AM
71.137.9.2

Rule #34. No exceptions.

Posted by Wagner at May 27, 2006 01:27 PM
66.68.108.122

ew. i think you just destroyed my childhood

Posted by Charles at May 27, 2006 10:58 PM
70.226.23.54

sure, calvin and hobbes sodomizing each other is wrong, but Michael Jackson and kids from Family Circus... that's just good ol' fashion fun!!

Actually, i'd probably read Family Circus if that happened.

"Who molested these children?" "Not me!"

Posted by marvelous patric at May 28, 2006 10:34 PM
66.242.66.41

I think the term that may be applicable is "Schadenfreude Pornography": sexually explicit materials generated solely for the purpose of relishing the suffering that results from its existence.

Also: Rule 34 is a pretty good shorthand.

Posted by Lyra at May 29, 2006 08:07 PM
68.163.146.127

Post a comment